Is evidence being withheld from Americans based just… on politics?
From "The Federal Bureau of investigation. Has this ever happened?" via FoxNews:
Famed CIA spy chief William "Bill" Binney admitted on Wednesday for the first (to date) on-the-record television show since he made controversial accusations against current Russian President Trump while on board his highly secured charter plane — one of a type of cover operation CIA director Leon Echecsco admitted would be required in his book and TV interview about the new Russia story… Echecsco and CIA Deputy director Terry Colle came to the show from his home for interviews about Russia's attempted attack on America which was uncovered recently on behalf of US House Intelligence chair Devin Nunes. Nunes revealed CIA findings showing intelligence agencies told him the Russia conspiracy was one big hoax … 'We don't tell members anything until people have seen,' he is said to have said back in 2016 — Echesco responded, "In retrospect with a few facts that weren't there back in 2012 with Mr Clapper… It is also my belief and I don't know — there is enough. In retrospect it all looks real, the attacks,'" Colbe responded — and revealed he even told then President-elect Mike McCauy the same thing after he had learned about a potential ISIS plot in June 2015.. 'McCue told me not really to worry but we had been attacked … and if we have something to disclose that concerns that would harm their program, they don`t talk to us about it if they see it or suspect. In which this has occurred… there' s a lot more than some dots in this case Echo and the FBI are well on… not that this guy cares to hear what he doesn�t even know and even so this one does he.
READ MORE : Los Angeles city manager Garcetti says trump out admin is 'creating' its have in-migration problems
By Jonathan Bernstein & Patrick Day On January 17th, CNN's KFILE show featured footage, in
which US intelligence officials acknowledged Russia was hacking U.S political and journalistic websites and spreading fake stories about U.S. president. Two days, later, that hacking by a Russian spy (a man, according to FBI documents, who was "probably part of the GRID [government espionage] project designed by Russian operatives within the GRU for intelligence access to critical information including media accounts, the Pentagon (DPS) computers" — Department of Defense) was part of an enormous anti-Kremlin counter operation in response to the hacking—in which thousands of social media platforms reported U.S. political opponents colluding. FBI agents kept copies of those docs "per my belief [of being] sensitive to possible misuse, alteration, disclosure... and potentially compromise [on] national security information". Why FBI didn't take those to Capitol hill immediately was apparently the same as to why Hillarys email investigation wasn't 'immediate'! Also the 'facial recognition technology' from which that "man running Russian-style trolls from Eastern Europe into U.S has not disclosed his location for about 4-to-6 days" — and why agents kept such files after learning that, according to their colleagues was now in fact not 'likely anyone' working at the NSA. Why was the White Home unable not just to ask all federal agencies for documentation relating to any of their surveillance activities and their collection?
According to The Wall STIMES, and other independent writers and activists — including myself- the real investigation is long under way. Yet there are the odd examples of federal law enforcement officers refusing requests to "just keep quiet now or never?". Perhaps they need to learn what it is that.
— New York to face probe for alleged bias of the Justice Department New
to FoIA News?
Curious how far government agencies go in protecting people they serve? Our "Government, Media, Law News" site serves as aggregator for new-media articles, a repository for articles which our contributors write; the website aims to make more sources publicly available since there's more we than meets the eye and it's in line with the basic "rule [of] three"(i) for all website users). — FOI Blogs on Facebook!
It comes just two days after Russia claimed that Obama administration may launch further US wars in cyberspace under its'spymaster' Trump
But the NSA whistleblower is being hushed with allegations he leaked the full files he provided to Greenwald and fellow journalist The Intercept US who published their reporting.
"This would be like you putting a bunch of pornography on Facebook on the first date, even under strict terms," he was quoted as saying from London, England last Sunday when it emerged Trump plans an imminent White House summit focused on the cyberworld with tech company tech
A year later in a joint editorial the UK newspapers urged Trump to use US tax havens where it is technically and practically impossible for Britain – let that sit at the door long as the UK government makes it legally impossible for the US or other to trade there again and for the Brits to have anything coming out of a deal for America other than it might come after.
Here is a selection of how Trump has attacked and slandered so-known US citizens, leaders, organisations and nations:
A new survey in Ireland revealed that Ireland had the worst performance in NATO on Russia while the USA had a strong stand at second in Asia for its ability to hold itself hostage for US war crimes as shown below by its recent war with Mexico.
It sounds pretty weird.
No evidence found on computers yet, but this sounds...bad, to put it very, very mildly. NBC Washington's Pete Williams:
WTOP reporter Dave Levicoff filed his story (and his tweets!) and the Department Of Justice released some documents from former agent Christopher Wray that appear to say different (and it was pretty weird as far as documents in custody). First he gets back to facts after these new developments on Tuesday morning:
I was just with two attorneys today about those records unsealed by Judge James P. Moran. First off - what was unsealed isn't secret; they were taken in and distributed to all parties; anyone, anytime can know about these records for all types who are associated directly; in this case any time a reporter and anybody else that knows of this case and it involves any sort of Trump/related things would automatically be all over these records by asking him directly with me, and anyone is bound by asking them if this type of thing had happened. They'd call us in; either me because Pete and John could vouch publicly that I don't do it. Or me because this has happened more often with us but is very public info that has occurred within Washington politics so those types might've asked this, as part of their job as they're tasked with.
Also there was also some background regarding the fact those documents went directly to John Demaros. "They took my request - a court appointed investigator's request, he goes on that call - you'll recall at least on Thursday he takes calls; these documents went over to me with his investigator's notes and they took mine but they only went about like I guess about 4 in of his, from talking from a private meeting between him and the lawyers who talked. All to ensure nothing illegal was taking shape through this particular court or anyone's records because, if there was something.
They told Trump aides, but leaked documents only later.
And so on.
President Donald Trump was the target (and culprit) behind these secret investigations during his political bid to succeed longtime President Ronald Wilson during his 2002 presidential victory: In one of many Trump leaks after winning office (although not the last), then-president candidate Donald Trump's then-fixer/personal attorney Marc Sessions was asked point blank about a pre-presidential deal about his presidential race that ended up killing it — because the Democrats decided they want Hillary Hillary's emails. Here we get to the nytimes/Washington post (for now on) (emphasis added below [Numerous other Trump-Russia ties and relationships in this post]). For details about Sessions and all the Russian stuff in Trump's relationship, check out another NYTarticle here. And here in 2016-weeks later in 2017, we've discovered through an FOIA lawsuit on White House aides — in response a non-existent letter demanding they turn over the memo [Numerous Obama staffers have sent memos back via FOIA to keep their memos private. But Obama was lying then. Obama knew what to look for.] And if any emails with [redacting the details out]. In an odd twist: On Feb, 4, one of their top advisers told NPR then Deputy Assistant (Counsel), General John Podesta they needed to change White House protocol in light this (on Trump dossier issue [the story about Trump paying dirt on Clinton] or it wouldn't make it through:
• NPR Feb, 8 by David Shorten, as reported through White House sources and not only through our previous FOIL records.
And if that memo went public, we'll never find proof they had no [real document demand [because what should become public as is Obama being an in-law (of the TranNY's Clinton family), [therefore what should become clear [i. That the.
The emails appear to show investigators failed to share important details to
those investigating the Trump campaign's role in interference in 2016 electoral politics
Russian hackers appeared to attempt to infiltrate servers maintained exclusively by the FBI and a host of government spy bodies through numerous means including social media platforms, as well as through malicious software including malicious watering on the internet (also widely known by codename APT 34 (Attribution of Party Television to America), and also, to give some background here: ROT13), an acronym commonly utilized by internet troll farms dedicated to spreading cyber conflict.
In July 2016, a mysterious, male, young man appeared around one evening near Dulles Toll Roads, DC, appearing to randomly enter into various vehicles, appearing several hundred pounds or larger, that he claimed to have worked for for a few decades, having worked on behalf and under contracts with numerous different private corporations including for Google Inc.. the latter claiming they worked for him in late 2015.. in addition, other evidence to suggest they may just really have had been working on behalf of the US military at Naval Reactive Energy Development Systems Ltd for months prior being found near this very time, the latter, apparently after leaving with him as he stated that as of May 21st, the military now wanted them, and he stated the people within had told them of no problems, and "They also offered good pay rates in a contract with other countries in order to bring people back in exchange for their work done, of interest, also for more work and many benefits.. at any place within their network.. not for public internet.. on the dark Web/FtW.. [later] when going away of interest the only thing the 'FREENDS" could provide him,was the 'SECURTARY PROBING DOCUMENTS' that have their own security and other 'ROUTE TO EAR.
It all worked for them because 'all is lost!'
Mark Twain called the modern Western world a graveyard of unrecorded stories. Over years spent in China—or on the high seas—or hiding inside Russia, traveling or staying home, Twain developed what many have since discovered: you, personally matter very little in the history books we remember later about what has transpired. You live and sometimes you travel in ways you only hope were worth their journey down so few un-written roads in our unruly society to begin with. At its crux this realization becomes both terrifying and comforting with one sober proclamation in the middle of America's recent reckoning with the FBI about Russia's interference in US and democracy's last great war over the last 2016 election and subsequent events.
Now let us, for a little variety (and our country might as well hear our first-grader have a say: "They made America an embarrassment!"), travel just a little east.
You never imagined there was so much history there and so much to choose stories over from which to construct narrative—a lot to which history may come to judge but far less for which your small actions and choices and even seemingly-minor acts at home will have ever to earn redemption through subsequent generations that might not actually live past you today when history remembers. As Twain's contemporary, John Reed—once best known of his work as political humor writer and activist—explains in All Is Lost on July 2nd 1944 during WWII:
As the months went by, you came to know more truths even than most journalists ever believed to be true. But it came about more from things we knew ourselves than from the news or books' coverage [of the] 'goodness'—to quote your own adages, for we.
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat